15I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say.
16The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?
17For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.
18Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?
19What say I then? that the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing?
20But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.
21Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils.
22Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he?
23All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.
24Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth.
25Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake:
26For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof.
27If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake.
28But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof:
29Conscience, I say, not thine own, but of the other: for why is my liberty judged of another man's conscience?
30For if I by grace be a partaker, why am I evil spoken of for that for which I give thanks?
31Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God.
Basically: “I don’t believe in it, what does it matter if I do a culturally significant thing if I don’t believe in it?”
And then the text goes on to give a good answer to that question, I’ve got another one.
I’m not just picking on Christians here, I see this attitude in members of closed religions all the time, and it’s a level of cognitive dissonance I could not live with. You also see it in gurus who have wandered off the path they’ve committed to. In the latter case, it’s absolutely a behavioral red flag.
The reason given in the text not to follow this logic is that those seeing you, a Christian, participating in a non-Christian religious activity, don’t have the same conviction that you do, and may be led into doing something sinful by your example. Not a bad answer, but I’ve got questions, and I have thoughts on this entire thought process.
First of all. The entire line of thinking behind ‘I don’t believe in it so why does it matter if I do something that other people believe in?’ is gross and narcissistic. It’s rude as hell not to recognize things that people other than you consider sacred. There are definitely elements of xenophobia, cultural supremacism, and likely racism that need to be sat with in that. But seriously, what the heck are you doing? If your God tells you not to fuck with other religions, why are you doing it? What other, better reason are you waiting for? Stahp.
Now that’s settled, let’s get back to how fucked up this train of thought is with a little…
Let’s imagine that there is a Christian church in Japan. A group of college students from a university near the church start to come to the choir and orchestra practice after classes. They are very polite and dedicated to the music, but never want to talk about Christianity. Everyone takes their interest in good faith and they get good enough to sing and play instruments in the church services. They bring their friends. They raise money to install a better sound system in the church. They start to wear cross necklaces, clothing emblazoned with bible quotes, and get tattoos of Jesus. They come to every service, adding more and more music and singing to the services, enriching them with their enthusiasm. They come to church meetings and advocate for the church’s music program. The church members welcome them into the congregation with open arms, only to be told: “Church is just for music practice. None of us are Christian, but we come hear to learn music. We thought it didn’t matter since we don’t believe in anything that the music or services are about.”
And then: “It’s fine though, since you’re bothered. We have our own practice space and just came back for our sound system. We need more space anyway because we have a bunch of people that want to learn ‘Church’ and we are going to share your amazing singing techniques with the world! Your hymns put all the notes and random noises together in such a challenging way, we love it! We’re angels now! Y’know, because we sing?” Pointing enthusiastically, “She did a version of Ave Maria that went viral!”
Now you spend your life explaining what Church really means, or listen to people constantly talking about it being singing practice.
Would you encourage your Christian friends to attend ‘Church’? Would you start using Church to mean music class just to stop arguing about it 24/7? How would you respond when someone who knew nothing about Christianity called you stupid for saying that Church was more than music practice?
How would it make you feel?
If how you’re feeling right now is mad and indignant and full of points about how wrong I am here, hold up. Let me tell you…
The word Yoga is used frequently in Hinduism and means a spiritual path. Krishna explains the 3 primary Yogas in the Bhagavad Gita, and body poses are not included in any of them. Krishna mentions a 4th Yoga but it is not well recorded until centuries later by a Hindu Saint named Patanjali. 8 limbs of Yoga practice are given for this 4th path. Body postures are one of them, considered the least important overall.
Jesus describes how Christians should meet to worship him in the Bible. It involves several things, music and singing are not a significant part of what he describes. Practicing one of the 3 primary Yogas is something that every Hindu is called to do, but a Christian can live alone in a cave without a church and still be a good Christian. When a Hindu goes to live in a cave, it’s to do the 4th Yoga.
Sanskrit is an ancient language considered holy in Hindu practice. Hinduisms oldest and most influential scriptures are written in it. Historically it functioned much like Latin for India, Southeast Asia, and parts of the Middle East, allowing for the exchange of ideas. It is still the primary language for Hindu hymns, blessings, and devotionals. That means that it is actively being spoken and sung in the majority of Hindu services and home worship in the present day. Sanskrit is also used frequently in Buddhist scriptures, hymns, and services.
Being the liturgical language of the Dharmic faiths, it is culturally equivalent with Latin in Christianity. And while it is also a dead language, it is still used every day by Hindus and Buddhists in their religious devotions. That is much less common for Latin in the many branches and sects of Christianity. Once again, the analogy is good but the part of Dharmic culture being dismissed is even more relevant and important than the Christian equivalents I use in this analogy.
Singing and body poses are both tangential to their respective religions.
Angels and yogis are seen as supernatural and holy in their respective religious scriptures. They informally have a demi-God like status within the practice of their religions.
Jesus, Shiva, Krishna, Ganesh, Durga, Parvati, these are all forms of the divine. Probably best not to put any of their pictures up in the bathroom. Perhaps a reason to reconsider slapping Jesus’ face on everything so casually. If a jerk Christian can buy a t-shirt with Shiva on it and wear it to a strip club, a jerk Hindu can do the same with a t-shirt with Jesus on it. I guarantee you it’s been done the same on all sides, and we should all quit.
Shiva, Parvati, Krishna, Dattatreya, and I’m sure at least a couple others, are Gods of Yoga. If all that means is poses then that means the Bhagavad Gita, a text which has inspired some of the most formidable intellects of the modern world, is about Krishna giving Arjuna a quick refresher on Surya Namaskara to cure his pre-war depression. It takes over 30 chapters for them to finish the yoga lesson, and somehow doing some yoga poses has inspired Arjuna to worship his childhood friend.
If yoga is just poses, then Shiva and Parvati, one of Hinduism’s more romanticized partnerships, have a relationship based on tricking each other into teaching poses they already learned in secret. It makes no sense and it’s a really sad flattening of their interactions.
Hindus aren’t mad. They’re glad you’re getting what you can out of yoga. It’s just confusing and a little disappointing when we see you’ve hung the original Mona Lisa backwards on the wall because you’re in love with the texture of the unpainted wood on the back.
And if you’re one of the westerners like me, who never even knew Leonardo DaVinci’s most famous painting was on the other side of that old board on the wall, welcome to the club.